![]() ![]() I liked how the VinylStudio was tied into a database where it would automatically find the gaps between tracks, auto-name the files as I saved them separately, and so on. As with Photoshop however, with images, I sometimes find that the professional software is too much overkill for me. I have Adobe Audition (being a former Cool Edit Pro user) and it functions in much the same way as Audacity and I agree it is a great professional solution. I just use a minimum of filtering and for me it has been satisfying. Maybe I didn’t give it a fair chance, but, when I saw that that program had not been updated in years and the VinylStudio software still seemed to be a current product with updates (although not regular ones) I switched to it with better results. I used the “Spin it Again” software and agree totally that it was very aggressive in the filtering and really did impact the sound. It’s when you start to get into the tweaking that you describe where I think it makes a difference. In regard to software, I would absolutely agree that there are a lot of software programs out there, including probably the canned Windows or MAC programs, that let you bring in the raw sound file and for that reason the software does not matter. I agree with you that more than 44.1 seems a waste on ripping vinyl. In short it did all I wanted it to do (and it probably does lots more than I will ever learn in audio editing). I cannot say how Audacity compares to other software because I only used Audacity, but I can say I was able to record, split the file into individual tracks, check for any clipped parts of the recording, manipulate small sections of audio to filter out clicks, enter tags, and save to flac, all from within Audacity. There are limitless ‘undo’ operations available so you can go back to what you had before. With Audacity you can select a finite part of the waveform, say several milliseconds, which contains a click and keep trying various parameters of click removal until you are happy with the result. The result took away SQ from the recording so he decided to use no click and pop filtering. That software applied ‘click and pop’ removal over the whole of the recording or not at all. ![]() You never know how much of a learning curve is required until you have used it, but recommendations can be very helpful. The problem is that you will only know what the software can do when you have used it. I honestly think the software is the least important part, but you do need to know that it will get you your desired result. As you are seeing you will get much much debate over that however. ![]() I also think 44.1 is more than enough as it already exceeds the dynamic range of vinyl. I have no interest personally in that, I want my file to sound digital, I have simply ripped them because they are not available on CD.įor that reason I meticulously get rid of the background hiss and many of the pops and clicks and “purify” if you will the sound of the file. They want to hear exactly what they do on the vinyl so they want to hear the pops and clicks and sounds of the table itself. Some people who rip vinyl will find this concept appalling. I also found the program chock full of useful filters and clean up tools. I use the NAD converter and have been well satisfied with it.Įasy enough but now on to the debatable parts. In conjunction with a good A/D converter I found it easy to use and maneuver through. I use a product called VinylStudio ( ) which is the program recommended by PS Audio and others. Of equal importance I think is the software used to do the rips.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |